mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Controlling dynamical systems to complex target states using machine learning: next-generation vs. classical reservoir computing

arXiv 2307.07195 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.NE cs.SYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Controlling nonlinear dynamical systems using machine learning allows to not only drive systems into simple behavior like periodicity but also to more complex arbitrary dynamics. For this, it is crucial that a machine learning system can be trained to reproduce the target dynamics sufficiently well. On the example of forcing a chaotic parametrization of the Lorenz system into intermittent dynamics, we show first that classical reservoir computing excels at this task. In a next step, we compare those results based on different amounts of training data to an alternative setup, where next-generation reservoir computing is used instead. It turns out that while delivering comparable performance for usual amounts of training data, next-generation RC significantly outperforms in situations where only very limited data is available. This opens even further practical control applications in real world problems where data is restricted.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.

Builds on

6 of 26 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021Next Generation Reservoir Computingcited by 160
  2. 2020Machine learning prediction of critical transition and system collapsecited by 54
  3. 2022Learning Spatiotemporal Chaos Using Next-Generation Reservoir Computingcited by 20
  4. 2021Controlling nonlinear dynamical systems into arbitrary states using machine learningcited by 5
  5. 2022Time Shifts to Reduce the Size of Reservoir Computerscited by 3
  6. 2020Breaking Symmetries of the Reservoir Equations in Echo State Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.