Bilevel linear optimization belongs to NP and admits polynomial-size KKT-based reformulations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is a well-known result that bilevel linear optimization is NP-hard. In many publications, reformulations as mixed-integer linear optimization problems are proposed, which suggests that the decision version of the problem belongs to NP. However, to the best of our knowledge, a rigorous proof of membership in NP has never been published, so we close this gap by reporting a simple but not entirely trivial proof. A related question is whether a large enough "big M" for the classical KKT-based reformulation can be computed efficiently, which we answer in the affirmative. In particular, our big M has polynomial encoding length in the original problem data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.