mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bilevel linear optimization belongs to NP and admits polynomial-size KKT-based reformulations

arXiv 2307.06639 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2023math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is a well-known result that bilevel linear optimization is NP-hard. In many publications, reformulations as mixed-integer linear optimization problems are proposed, which suggests that the decision version of the problem belongs to NP. However, to the best of our knowledge, a rigorous proof of membership in NP has never been published, so we close this gap by reporting a simple but not entirely trivial proof. A related question is whether a large enough "big M" for the classical KKT-based reformulation can be computed efficiently, which we answer in the affirmative. In particular, our big M has polynomial encoding length in the original problem data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.