mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Large Class Separation is not what you need for Relational Reasoning-based OOD Detection

arXiv 2307.06179 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard recognition approaches are unable to deal with novel categories at test time. Their overconfidence on the known classes makes the predictions unreliable for safety-critical applications such as healthcare or autonomous driving. Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) detection methods provide a solution by identifying semantic novelty. Most of these methods leverage a learning stage on the known data, which means training (or fine-tuning) a model to capture the concept of normality. This process is clearly sensitive to the amount of available samples and might be computationally expensive for on-board systems. A viable alternative is that of evaluating similarities in the embedding space produced by large pre-trained models without any further learning effort. We focus exactly on such a fine-tuning-free OOD detection setting. This works presents an in-depth analysis of the recently introduced relational reasoning pre-training and investigates the properties of the learned embedding, highlighting the existence of a correlation between the inter-class feature distance and the OOD detection accuracy. As the class separation depends on the chosen pre-training objective, we propose an alternative loss function to control the inter-class margin, and we show its advantage with thorough experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2023.

Builds on

25 of 27 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  5. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  7. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  8. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  9. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  10. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  11. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
  12. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
13 more
  1. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
  2. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
  3. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  4. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
  5. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  6. 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
  7. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  8. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 357
  9. 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 252
  10. 2022Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representationscited by 216
  11. 2020CrossTransformers: spatially-aware few-shot transfercited by 174
  12. 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
  13. 2022Semantic Novelty Detection via Relational Reasoningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.