mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI-Generated Imagery: A New Era for the `Readymade'

arXiv 2307.06033 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2023cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While the term `art' defies any concrete definition, this paper aims to examine how digital images produced by generative AI systems, such as Midjourney, have come to be so regularly referred to as such. The discourse around the classification of AI-generated imagery as art is currently somewhat homogeneous, lacking the more nuanced aspects that would apply to more traditional modes of artistic media production. This paper aims to bring important philosophical considerations to the surface of the discussion around AI-generated imagery in the context of art. We employ existing philosophical frameworks and theories of language to suggest that some AI-generated imagery, by virtue of its visual properties within these frameworks, can be presented as `readymades' for consideration as art.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2023.

Builds on

1 of 15 references.

References · 1

  1. 2016Modelling Creativity: Identifying Key Components through a Corpus-Based Approachcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.