mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Factuality of Abstractive Summarization via Contrastive Reward Learning

arXiv 2307.04507 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern abstractive summarization models often generate summaries that contain hallucinated or contradictory information. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective contrastive learning framework that incorporates recent developments in reward learning and factuality metrics. Empirical studies demonstrate that the proposed framework enables summarization models to learn from feedback of factuality metrics using contrastive reward learning, leading to more factual summaries by human evaluations. This suggests that further advances in learning and evaluation algorithms can feed directly into providing more factual summaries.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2023.

Builds on

26 of 31 references.

References · 26

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  5. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  6. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  7. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
  8. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  9. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  10. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
  11. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
  12. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
14 more
  1. 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 292
  2. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 241
  3. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
  4. 2022BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarizationcited by 161
  5. 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
  6. 2021SimCLS: A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Abstractive Summarizationcited by 131
  7. 2020GSum: A General Framework for Guided Neural Abstractive Summarizationcited by 129
  8. 2021CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 120
  9. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
  10. 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
  11. 2019Beyond BLEU: Training Neural Machine Translation with Semantic Similaritycited by 84
  12. 2020Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 66
  13. 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
  14. 2021CO2Sum:Contrastive Learning for Factual-Consistent Abstractive Summarizationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

9 papers.