mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

To pretrain or not to pretrain? A case study of domain-specific pretraining for semantic segmentation in histopathology

arXiv 2307.03275 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2023cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Annotating medical imaging datasets is costly, so fine-tuning (or transfer learning) is the most effective method for digital pathology vision applications such as disease classification and semantic segmentation. However, due to texture bias in models trained on real-world images, transfer learning for histopathology applications might result in underperforming models, which necessitates the need for using unlabeled histopathology data and self-supervised methods to discover domain-specific characteristics. Here, we tested the premise that histopathology-specific pretrained models provide better initializations for pathology vision tasks, i.e., gland and cell segmentation. In this study, we compare the performance of gland and cell segmentation tasks with histopathology domain-specific and non-domain-specific (real-world images) pretrained weights. Moreover, we investigate the dataset size at which domain-specific pretraining produces significant gains in performance. In addition, we investigated whether domain-specific initialization improves the effectiveness of out-of-distribution testing on distinct datasets but the same task. The results indicate that performance gain using domain-specific pretrained weights depends on both the task and the size of the training dataset. In instances with limited dataset sizes, a significant improvement in gland segmentation performance was also observed, whereas models trained on cell segmentation datasets exhibit no improvement.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2023.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  5. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  6. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  7. 2023BiomedCLIP: a multimodal biomedical foundation model pretrained from fifteen million scientific image-text pairscited by 520
  8. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
  9. 2016Gland Segmentation in Colon Histology Images: The GlaS Challenge Contestcited by 203
  10. 2022Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning on Diverse Pathology Datasetscited by 150
  11. 2020MS-Net: Multi-Site Network for Improving Prostate Segmentation with Heterogeneous MRI Datacited by 121
  12. 2018MILD-Net: Minimal Information Loss Dilated Network for Gland Instance Segmentation in Colon Histology Imagescited by 87
3 more
  1. 2018Methods for Segmentation and Classification of Digital Microscopy Tissue Imagescited by 73
  2. 2021Factors of Influence for Transfer Learning across Diverse Appearance Domains and Task Typescited by 54
  3. 2022EBHI-Seg: A Novel Enteroscope Biopsy Histopathological Haematoxylin and Eosin Image Dataset for Image Segmentation Taskscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.