In Time and Space: Towards Usable Adaptive Control for Assistive Robotic Arms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robotic solutions, in particular robotic arms, are becoming more frequently deployed for close collaboration with humans, for example in manufacturing or domestic care environments. These robotic arms require the user to control several Degrees-of-Freedom (DoFs) to perform tasks, primarily involving grasping and manipulating objects. Standard input devices predominantly have two DoFs, requiring time-consuming and cognitively demanding mode switches to select individual DoFs. Contemporary Adaptive DoF Mapping Controls (ADMCs) have shown to decrease the necessary number of mode switches but were up to now not able to significantly reduce the perceived workload. Users still bear the mental workload of incorporating abstract mode switching into their workflow. We address this by providing feed-forward multimodal feedback using updated recommendations of ADMC, allowing users to visually compare the current and the suggested mapping in real-time. We contrast the effectiveness of two new approaches that a) continuously recommend updated DoF combinations or b) use discrete thresholds between current robot movements and new recommendations. Both are compared in a Virtual Reality (VR) in-person study against a classic control method. Significant results for lowered task completion time, fewer mode switches, and reduced perceived workload conclusively establish that in combination with feedforward, ADMC methods can indeed outperform classic mode switching. A lack of apparent quantitative differences between Continuous and Threshold reveals the importance of user-centered customization options. Including these implications in the development process will improve usability, which is essential for successfully implementing robotic technologies with high user acceptance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2023.
Builds on
2 of 31 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023AdaptiX -- A Transitional XR Framework for Development and Evaluation of Shared Control Applications in Assistive Roboticscited by 3
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models to Facilitate Variable Autonomy for Human-Robot Teamingcited by 3
- 2024Exploring of Discrete and Continuous Input Control for AI-enhanced Assistive Robotic Armscited by 1
- 2024Adaptive Control in Assistive Application -- A Study Evaluating Shared Control by Users with Limited Upper Limb Mobilitycited by 0
- 2024Adaptive Control in Assistive Application -- A Study Evaluating Shared Control by Users with Limited Upper Limb Mobility10 Jun 2024
- 2024Exploring of Discrete and Continuous Input Control for AI-enhanced Assistive Robotic Arms13 Jan 2024
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models to Facilitate Variable Autonomy for Human-Robot Teaming12 Dec 2023
- 2023AdaptiX -- A Transitional XR Framework for Development and Evaluation of Shared Control Applications in Assistive Robotics24 Oct 2023