mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A probabilistic, data-driven closure model for RANS simulations with aleatoric, model uncertainty

arXiv 2307.02432 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2023physics.flu-dyn cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a data-driven, closure model for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations that incorporates aleatoric, model uncertainty. The proposed closure consists of two parts. A parametric one, which utilizes previously proposed, neural-network-based tensor basis functions dependent on the rate of strain and rotation tensor invariants. This is complemented by latent, random variables which account for aleatoric model errors. A fully Bayesian formulation is proposed, combined with a sparsity-inducing prior in order to identify regions in the problem domain where the parametric closure is insufficient and where stochastic corrections to the Reynolds stress tensor are needed. Training is performed using sparse, indirect data, such as mean velocities and pressures, in contrast to the majority of alternatives that require direct Reynolds stress data. For inference and learning, a Stochastic Variational Inference scheme is employed, which is based on Monte Carlo estimates of the pertinent objective in conjunction with the reparametrization trick. This necessitates derivatives of the output of the RANS solver, for which we developed an adjoint-based formulation. In this manner, the parametric sensitivities from the differentiable solver can be combined with the built-in, automatic differentiation capability of the neural network library in order to enable an end-to-end differentiable framework. We demonstrate the capability of the proposed model to produce accurate, probabilistic, predictive estimates for all flow quantities, even in regions where model errors are present, on a separated flow in the backward-facing step benchmark problem.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2023.

Builds on

14 of 102 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  4. 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
  5. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
  6. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  7. 2018Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programmingcited by 379
  8. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 201
  9. 2022Learned Turbulence Modelling with Differentiable Fluid Solvers: Physics-based Loss-functions and Optimisation Horizonscited by 39
  10. 2016Machine Learning-augmented Predictive Modeling of Turbulent Separated Flows over Airfoilscited by 20
  11. 2018Quantifying model form uncertainty in Reynolds-averaged turbulence models with Bayesian deep neural networkscited by 20
  12. 2022Emerging trends in machine learning for computational fluid dynamicscited by 7
2 more
  1. 2018Physics-constrained, data-driven discovery of coarse-grained dynamicscited by 3
  2. 2021A fully-differentiable compressible high-order computational fluid dynamics solvercited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.