Once-Training-All-Fine: No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Domain-relevance Degradation Description
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The visual quality of point clouds plays a crucial role in the development and broadcasting of immersive media. Therefore, investigating point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) is instrumental in facilitating immersive media applications, including virtual reality and augmented reality applications. Considering reference point clouds are not available in many cases, no-reference (NR) metrics have become a research hotspot. Existing NR methods suffer from difficult training. To address this shortcoming, we propose a novel NR-PCQA method, Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Domain-relevance Degradation Description (D3-PCQA). First, we demonstrate our model's interpretability by deriving the function of each module using a kernelized ridge regression model. Specifically, quality assessment can be characterized as a leap from the scattered perceptual domain (reflecting subjective perception) to the ordered quality domain (reflecting mean opinion score). Second, to reduce the significant domain discrepancy, we establish an intermediate domain, the description domain, based on insights from the human visual system (HVS), by considering the domain relevance among samples located in the perception domain and learning a structured latent space. The anchor features derived from the learned latent space are generated as cross-domain auxiliary information to promote domain transformation. Furthermore, the newly established description domain decomposes the NR-PCQA problem into two relevant stages. These stages include a classification stage that gives the degradation descriptions to point clouds and a regression stage to determine the confidence degrees of descriptions, providing a semantic explanation for the predicted quality scores. Experimental results demonstrate that D3-PCQA exhibits robust performance and outstanding generalization on several publicly available datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2025CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 5
- 2025Towards Fine-Grained Text-to-3D Quality Assessment: A Benchmark and A Two-Stage Rank-Learning Metriccited by 2
- 2025From Images to Point Clouds: An Efficient Solution for Cross-media Blind Quality Assessment without Annotated Trainingcited by 1
- 2025Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Surveycited by 1
- 2026UPDA: Unsupervised Progressive Domain Adaptation for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 1
- 2024Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Cloudscited by 0
- 2025Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026PointQ-Bench: Benchmarking Diagnostic and Interpretable Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026PointQ-Bench: Benchmarking Diagnostic and Interpretable Point Cloud Quality Assessment27 May 2026
- 2026UPDA: Unsupervised Progressive Domain Adaptation for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment12 Feb 2026
- 2025Towards Fine-Grained Text-to-3D Quality Assessment: A Benchmark and A Two-Stage Rank-Learning Metric28 Sep 2025
- 2025Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey28 Jun 2025
- 2025Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessment26 Jan 2025
- 2025From Images to Point Clouds: An Efficient Solution for Cross-media Blind Quality Assessment without Annotated Training23 Jan 2025
- 2025CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality Assessment17 Jan 2025
- 2024Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Clouds9 Oct 2024