mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Estimating Post-OCR Denoising Complexity on Numerical Texts

arXiv 2307.01020 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2023cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-OCR processing has significantly improved over the past few years. However, these have been primarily beneficial for texts consisting of natural, alphabetical words, as opposed to documents of numerical nature such as invoices, payslips, medical certificates, etc. To evaluate the OCR post-processing difficulty of these datasets, we propose a method to estimate the denoising complexity of a text and evaluate it on several datasets of varying nature, and show that texts of numerical nature have a significant disadvantage. We evaluate the estimated complexity ranking with respect to the error rates of modern-day denoising approaches to show the validity of our estimator.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2023.

Builds on

9 of 29 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  3. 2021ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte modelscited by 504
  4. 2019FUNSD: A Dataset for Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documentscited by 345
  5. 2021ICDAR2019 Competition on Scanned Receipt OCR and Information Extractioncited by 254
  6. 2017OpenNMT: Open-source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translationcited by 251
  7. 2021Representing Numbers in NLP: a Survey and a Visioncited by 83
  8. 2020Kleister: A novel task for Information Extraction involving Long Documents with Complex Layoutcited by 27
  9. 2021Post-OCR Document Correction with large Ensembles of Character Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.