NAUTILUS: boosting Bayesian importance nested sampling with deep learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a novel approach to boost the efficiency of the importance nested sampling (INS) technique for Bayesian posterior and evidence estimation using deep learning. Unlike rejection-based sampling methods such as vanilla nested sampling (NS) or Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, importance sampling techniques can use all likelihood evaluations for posterior and evidence estimation. However, for efficient importance sampling, one needs proposal distributions that closely mimic the posterior distributions. We show how to combine INS with deep learning via neural network regression to accomplish this task. We also introduce NAUTILUS, a reference open-source Python implementation of this technique for Bayesian posterior and evidence estimation. We compare NAUTILUS against popular NS and MCMC packages, including EMCEE, DYNESTY, ULTRANEST and POCOMC, on a variety of challenging synthetic problems and real-world applications in exoplanet detection, galaxy SED fitting and cosmology. In all applications, the sampling efficiency of NAUTILUS is substantially higher than that of all other samplers, often by more than an order of magnitude. Simultaneously, NAUTILUS delivers highly accurate results and needs fewer likelihood evaluations than all other samplers tested. We also show that NAUTILUS has good scaling with the dimensionality of the likelihood and is easily parallelizable to many CPUs.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 2 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2023.
Builds on
0 of 2 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Inferring Atmospheric Properties of Exoplanets with Flow Matching and Neural Importance Samplingcited by 4
- 2024Flow Matching for Atmospheric Retrieval of Exoplanets: Where Reliability meets Adaptive Noise Levelscited by 3
- 2025FlowVAT: Normalizing Flow Variational Inference with Affine-Invariant Temperingcited by 2
- 2024Simulation-based inference with scattering representations: scattering is all you needcited by 1
- 2025Improving Bayesian inference in PTA data analysis: importance nested sampling with Normalizing Flowscited by 0
- 2026Neural Transport Nested Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Neural Transport Nested Sampling24 Sep 2026
- 2025Improving Bayesian inference in PTA data analysis: importance nested sampling with Normalizing Flows3 Nov 2025
- 2025FlowVAT: Normalizing Flow Variational Inference with Affine-Invariant Tempering15 May 2025
- 2024Flow Matching for Atmospheric Retrieval of Exoplanets: Where Reliability meets Adaptive Noise Levels28 Oct 2024
- 2024Simulation-based inference with scattering representations: scattering is all you need11 Oct 2024
- 2023Inferring Atmospheric Properties of Exoplanets with Flow Matching and Neural Importance Sampling13 Dec 2023