mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimizing Credit Limit Adjustments Under Adversarial Goals Using Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2306.15585 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2023q-fin.GN cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning has been explored for many problems, from video games with deterministic environments to portfolio and operations management in which scenarios are stochastic; however, there have been few attempts to test these methods in banking problems. In this study, we sought to find and automatize an optimal credit card limit adjustment policy by employing reinforcement learning techniques. Because of the historical data available, we considered two possible actions per customer, namely increasing or maintaining an individual's current credit limit. To find this policy, we first formulated this decision-making question as an optimization problem in which the expected profit was maximized; therefore, we balanced two adversarial goals: maximizing the portfolio's revenue and minimizing the portfolio's provisions. Second, given the particularities of our problem, we used an offline learning strategy to simulate the impact of the action based on historical data from a super-app in Latin America to train our reinforcement learning agent. Our results, based on the proposed methodology involving synthetic experimentation, show that a Double Q-learning agent with optimized hyperparameters can outperform other strategies and generate a non-trivial optimal policy not only reflecting the complex nature of this decision but offering an incentive to explore reinforcement learning in real-world banking scenarios. Our research establishes a conceptual structure for applying reinforcement learning framework to credit limit adjustment, presenting an objective technique to make these decisions primarily based on data-driven methods rather than relying only on expert-driven systems. We also study the use of alternative data for the problem of balance prediction, as the latter is a requirement of our proposed model. We find the use of such data does not always bring prediction gains.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2023.

Builds on

9 of 78 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  4. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
  5. 2019AlphaStock: A Buying-Winners-and-Selling-Losers Investment Strategy using Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Attention Networkscited by 40
  6. 2020The Value of Big Data for Credit Scoring: Enhancing Financial Inclusion using Mobile Phone Data and Social Network Analyticscited by 21
  7. 2020The value of text for small business default prediction: A deep learning approachcited by 20
  8. 2020Super-App Behavioral Patterns in Credit Risk Models: Financial, Statistical and Regulatory Implicationscited by 9
  9. 2019MQLV: Optimal Policy of Money Management in Retail Banking with Q-Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.