mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Planning Landmark Based Goal Recognition Revisited: Does Using Initial State Landmarks Make Sense?

arXiv 2306.15362 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2023cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Goal recognition is an important problem in many application domains (e.g., pervasive computing, intrusion detection, computer games, etc.). In many application scenarios, it is important that goal recognition algorithms can recognize goals of an observed agent as fast as possible. However, many early approaches in the area of Plan Recognition As Planning, require quite large amounts of computation time to calculate a solution. Mainly to address this issue, recently, Pereira et al. developed an approach that is based on planning landmarks and is much more computationally efficient than previous approaches. However, the approach, as proposed by Pereira et al., also uses trivial landmarks (i.e., facts that are part of the initial state and goal description are landmarks by definition). In this paper, we show that it does not provide any benefit to use landmarks that are part of the initial state in a planning landmark based goal recognition approach. The empirical results show that omitting initial state landmarks for goal recognition improves goal recognition performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2023.

Builds on

4 of 20 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019Landmark-Based Approaches for Goal Recognition as Planningcited by 21
  2. 2018LSTM-Based Goal Recognition in Latent Spacecited by 8
  3. 2013Accounting for Context in Plan Recognition, with Application to Traffic Monitoringcited by 4
  4. 2020The More the Merrier?! Evaluating the Effect of Landmark Extraction Algorithms on Landmark-Based Goal Recognitioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.