Heuristic Approaches to Obtain Low-Discrepancy Point Sets via Subset Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Building upon the exact methods presented in our earlier work [J. Complexity, 2022], we introduce a heuristic approach for the star discrepancy subset selection problem. The heuristic gradually improves the current-best subset by replacing one of its elements at a time. While we prove that the heuristic does not necessarily return an optimal solution, we obtain very promising results for all tested dimensions. For example, for moderate point set sizes 30 ≤ n ≤ 240 in dimension 6, we obtain point sets with L∞ star discrepancy up to 35% better than that of the first n points of the Sobol' sequence. Our heuristic works in all dimensions, the main limitation being the precision of the discrepancy calculation algorithms. We also provide a comparison with a recent energy functional introduced by Steinerberger [J. Complexity, 2019], showing that our heuristic performs better on all tested instances.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Message-Passing Monte Carlo: Generating low-discrepancy point sets via Graph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2025carps: A Framework for Comparing N Hyperparameter Optimizers on M Benchmarkscited by 3
- 2025Optimizing Kernel Discrepancies via Subset Selectioncited by 1
- 2025Quasi-Random Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026A Bayesian Approach to Low-Discrepancy Subset Selectioncited by 0
- 2026A Bayesian Approach to Low-Discrepancy Subset Selection16 Feb 2026
- 2025Optimizing Kernel Discrepancies via Subset Selection4 Nov 2025
- 2025Quasi-Random Physics-informed Neural Networks10 Jul 2025
- 2025carps: A Framework for Comparing N Hyperparameter Optimizers on M Benchmarks6 Jun 2025
- 2024Message-Passing Monte Carlo: Generating low-discrepancy point sets via Graph Neural Networks23 May 2024