mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DSRM: Boost Textual Adversarial Training with Distribution Shift Risk Minimization

arXiv 2306.15164 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training is one of the best-performing methods in improving the robustness of deep language models. However, robust models come at the cost of high time consumption, as they require multi-step gradient ascents or word substitutions to obtain adversarial samples. In addition, these generated samples are deficient in grammatical quality and semantic consistency, which impairs the effectiveness of adversarial training. To address these problems, we introduce a novel, effective procedure for instead adversarial training with only clean data. Our procedure, distribution shift risk minimization (DSRM), estimates the adversarial loss by perturbing the input data's probability distribution rather than their embeddings. This formulation results in a robust model that minimizes the expected global loss under adversarial attacks. Our approach requires zero adversarial samples for training and reduces time consumption by up to 70% compared to current best-performing adversarial training methods. Experiments demonstrate that DSRM considerably improves BERT's resistance to textual adversarial attacks and achieves state-of-the-art robust accuracy on various benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2023.

Builds on

31 of 48 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  7. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  8. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  9. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
  10. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  11. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
  12. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
19 more
  1. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
  2. 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 264
  3. 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
  4. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
  5. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 183
  6. 2021On the Convergence and Robustness of Adversarial Trainingcited by 130
  7. 2020InfoBERT: Improving Robustness of Language Models from An Information Theoretic Perspectivecited by 92
  8. 2020OpenAttack: An Open-source Textual Adversarial Attack Toolkitcited by 84
  9. 2020AdvAug: Robust Adversarial Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 67
  10. 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
  11. 2021Searching for an Effective Defender: Benchmarking Defense against Adversarial Word Substitutioncited by 56
  12. 2020Better Robustness by More Coverage: Adversarial Training with Mixup Augmentation for Robust Fine-tuningcited by 39
  13. 2021Using Adversarial Attacks to Reveal the Statistical Bias in Machine Reading Comprehension Modelscited by 29
  14. 2022A Survey of Adversarial Defences and Robustness in NLPcited by 23
  15. 2019Detecting Overfitting via Adversarial Examplescited by 15
  16. 2021BERT is Robust! A Case Against Synonym-Based Adversarial Examples in Text Classificationcited by 9
  17. 2022Efficient Adversarial Training with Robust Early-Bird Ticketscited by 5
  18. 2022Improving robustness of language models from a geometry-aware perspectivecited by 4
  19. 2022Distinguishing Non-natural from Natural Adversarial Samples for More Robust Pre-trained Language Modelcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.