mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Thinking Like an Annotator: Generation of Dataset Labeling Instructions

arXiv 2306.14035 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2023cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale datasets are essential to modern day deep learning. Advocates argue that understanding these methods requires dataset transparency (e.g. "dataset curation, motivation, composition, collection process, etc..."). However, almost no one has suggested the release of the detailed definitions and visual category examples provided to annotators - information critical to understanding the structure of the annotations present in each dataset. These labels are at the heart of public datasets, yet few datasets include the instructions that were used to generate them. We introduce a new task, Labeling Instruction Generation, to address missing publicly available labeling instructions. In Labeling Instruction Generation, we take a reasonably annotated dataset and: 1) generate a set of examples that are visually representative of each category in the dataset; 2) provide a text label that corresponds to each of the examples. We introduce a framework that requires no model training to solve this task and includes a newly created rapid retrieval system that leverages a large, pre-trained vision and language model. This framework acts as a proxy to human annotators that can help to both generate a final labeling instruction set and evaluate its quality. Our framework generates multiple diverse visual and text representations of dataset categories. The optimized instruction set outperforms our strongest baseline across 5 folds by 7.06 mAP for NuImages and 12.9 mAP for COCO.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2023.

Builds on

4 of 42 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  2. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  3. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  4. 2022"This is my unicorn, Fluffy": Personalizing frozen vision-language representationscited by 95

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023GELDA: A generative language annotation framework to reveal visual biases in datasets
  2. 2024Pre-Trained Vision-Language Models as Partial Annotators
  3. 2024ProVision: Programmatically Scaling Vision-centric Instruction Data for Multimodal Language Models
  4. 2023InstructCV: Instruction-Tuned Text-to-Image Diffusion Models as Vision Generalists
  5. 2026Leveraging Vision-Language Models as Weak Annotators in Active Learning
  6. 2024Low-Biased General Annotated Dataset Generation
  7. 2024Modeling Collaborator: Enabling Subjective Vision Classification With Minimal Human Effort via LLM Tool-Use
  8. 2025ACT as Human: Multimodal Large Language Model Data Annotation with Critical Thinking