Interpreting Forecasted Vital Signs Using N-BEATS in Sepsis Patients
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting and predicting septic shock early is crucial for the best possible outcome for patients. Accurately forecasting the vital signs of patients with sepsis provides valuable insights to clinicians for timely interventions, such as administering stabilizing drugs or optimizing infusion strategies. Our research examines N-BEATS, an interpretable deep-learning forecasting model that can forecast 3 hours of vital signs for sepsis patients in intensive care units (ICUs). In this work, we use the N-BEATS interpretable configuration to forecast the vital sign trends and compare them with the actual trend to understand better the patient's changing condition and the effects of infused drugs on their vital signs. We evaluate our approach using the publicly available eICU Collaborative Research Database dataset and rigorously evaluate the vital sign forecasts using out-of-sample evaluation criteria. We present the performance of our model using error metrics, including mean squared error (MSE), mean average percentage error (MAPE), and dynamic time warping (DTW), where the best scores achieved are 18.52e-4, 7.60, and 17.63e-3, respectively. We analyze the samples where the forecasted trend does not match the actual trend and study the impact of infused drugs on changing the actual vital signs compared to the forecasted trend. Additionally, we examined the mortality rates of patients where the actual trend and the forecasted trend did not match. We observed that the mortality rate was higher (92%) when the actual and forecasted trends closely matched, compared to when they were not similar (84%).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2023.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 753
- 2022Comparing and extending the use of defeasible argumentation with quantitative data in real-world contextscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Low-Rank Adaptation of Time Series Foundational Models for Out-of-Domain Modality Forecastingcited by 18
- 2023Vital Sign Forecasting for Sepsis Patients in ICUscited by 4
- 2023Extending Machine Learning-Based Early Sepsis Detection to Different Demographicscited by 1
- 2024Interpretable Vital Sign Forecasting with Model Agnostic Attention Mapscited by 0
- 2024Low-Rank Adaptation of Time Series Foundational Models for Out-of-Domain Modality Forecasting16 May 2024
- 2024Interpretable Vital Sign Forecasting with Model Agnostic Attention Maps2 May 2024
- 2023Vital Sign Forecasting for Sepsis Patients in ICUs8 Nov 2023
- 2023Extending Machine Learning-Based Early Sepsis Detection to Different Demographics7 Nov 2023