Statistical relational learning and neuro-symbolic AI: what does first-order logic offer?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, our aim is to briefly survey and articulate the logical and philosophical foundations of using (first-order) logic to represent (probabilistic) knowledge in a non-technical fashion. Our motivation is three fold. First, for machine learning researchers unaware of why the research community cares about relational representations, this article can serve as a gentle introduction. Second, for logical experts who are newcomers to the learning area, such an article can help in navigating the differences between finite vs infinite, and subjective probabilities vs random-world semantics. Finally, for researchers from statistical relational learning and neuro-symbolic AI, who are usually embedded in finite worlds with subjective probabilities, appreciating what infinite domains and random-world semantics brings to the table is of utmost theoretical import.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2023.
Builds on
10 of 43 references.
References · 10
- 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 389
- 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 253
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
- 2020Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Logic Operatorscited by 100
- 2020Graph Neural Networks Meet Neural-Symbolic Computing: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 93
- 2020Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Implicationscited by 15
- 2021Explanations for Occluded Imagescited by 14
- 2019Challenges of Human-Aware AI Systemscited by 13
- 2013Learning Chordal Markov Networks by Constraint Satisfactioncited by 4
- 2019Implicitly Learning to Reason in First-Order Logiccited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.