Diverse Community Data for Benchmarking Data Privacy Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Collaborative Research Cycle (CRC) is a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) benchmarking program intended to strengthen understanding of tabular data deidentification technologies. Deidentification algorithms are vulnerable to the same bias and privacy issues that impact other data analytics and machine learning applications, and can even amplify those issues by contaminating downstream applications. This paper summarizes four CRC contributions: theoretical work on the relationship between diverse populations and challenges for equitable deidentification; public benchmark data focused on diverse populations and challenging features; a comprehensive open source suite of evaluation metrology for deidentified datasets; and an archive of more than 450 deidentified data samples from a broad range of techniques. The initial set of evaluation results demonstrate the value of these tools for investigations in this field.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2023.
Builds on
7 of 42 references.
References · 7
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
- 2021Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic datacited by 102
- 2021Benchmarking Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation Algorithmscited by 81
- 2023Synthcity: facilitating innovative use cases of synthetic data in different data modalitiescited by 76
- 2022A Unified Framework for Quantifying Privacy Risk in Synthetic Datacited by 46
- 2021An Uncertainty Principle is a Price of Privacy-Preserving Microdatacited by 2
- 2022Rule-adhering synthetic data -- the lingua franca of learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023The Inadequacy of Similarity-based Privacy Metrics: Privacy Attacks against "Truly Anonymous" Synthetic Datasetscited by 14
- 2025PIIvot: A Lightweight NLP Anonymization Framework for Question-Anchored Tutoring Dialoguescited by 11
- 2023Privacy Measurement in Tabular Synthetic Data: State of the Art and Future Research Directionscited by 4
- 2026TabQueryBench: A Query-Centric Benchmark for Synthetic Tabular Datacited by 2
- 2024Position: Challenges and Opportunities for Differential Privacy in the U.S. Federal Governmentcited by 0
- 2025Developing synthetic microdata through machine learning for firm-level business surveyscited by 0
- 2026TabQueryBench: A Query-Centric Benchmark for Synthetic Tabular Data4 Jul 2026
- 2025Developing synthetic microdata through machine learning for firm-level business surveys5 Dec 2025
- 2025PIIvot: A Lightweight NLP Anonymization Framework for Question-Anchored Tutoring Dialogues22 May 2025
- 2024Position: Challenges and Opportunities for Differential Privacy in the U.S. Federal Government21 Oct 2024
- 2023The Inadequacy of Similarity-based Privacy Metrics: Privacy Attacks against "Truly Anonymous" Synthetic Datasets8 Dec 2023
- 2023Privacy Measurement in Tabular Synthetic Data: State of the Art and Future Research Directions29 Nov 2023