Semi-automated extraction of research topics and trends from NCI funding in radiological sciences from 2000-2020
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Investigators, funders, and the public desire knowledge on topics and trends in publicly funded research but current efforts in manual categorization are limited in scale and understanding. We developed a semi-automated approach to extract and name research topics, and applied this to 1.9B of NCI funding over 21 years in the radiological sciences to determine micro- and macro-scale research topics and funding trends. Our method relies on sequential clustering of existing biomedical-based word embeddings, naming using subject matter experts, and visualization to discover trends at a macroscopic scale above individual topics. We present results using 15 and 60 cluster topics, where we found that 2D projection of grant embeddings reveals two dominant axes: physics-biology and therapeutic-diagnostic. For our dataset, we found that funding for therapeutics- and physics-based research have outpaced diagnostics- and biology-based research, respectively. We hope these results may (1) give insight to funders on the appropriateness of their funding allocation, (2) assist investigators in contextualizing their work and explore neighboring research domains, and (3) allow the public to review where their tax dollars are being allocated.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2023.
Builds on
5 of 23 references.
References · 5
- 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 678
- 2019Topic Modeling in Embedding Spacescited by 224
- 2020Top2Vec: Distributed Representations of Topicscited by 126
- 2020Tired of Topic Models? Clusters of Pretrained Word Embeddings Make for Fast and Good Topics too!cited by 73
- 2016An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generationcited by 48
Built on by
Not cited yet.