mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Achieving Sample and Computational Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Action Space Reduction via Grouping

arXiv 2306.12981 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning often needs to deal with the exponential growth of states and actions when exploring optimal control in high-dimensional spaces (often known as the curse of dimensionality). In this work, we address this issue by learning the inherent structure of action-wise similar MDP to appropriately balance the performance degradation versus sample/computational complexity. In particular, we partition the action spaces into multiple groups based on the similarity in transition distribution and reward function, and build a linear decomposition model to capture the difference between the intra-group transition kernel and the intra-group rewards. Both our theoretical analysis and experiments reveal a surprising and counter-intuitive result: while a more refined grouping strategy can reduce the approximation error caused by treating actions in the same group as identical, it also leads to increased estimation error when the size of samples or the computation resources is limited. This finding highlights the grouping strategy as a new degree of freedom that can be optimized to minimize the overall performance loss. To address this issue, we formulate a general optimization problem for determining the optimal grouping strategy, which strikes a balance between performance loss and sample/computational complexity. We further propose a computationally efficient method for selecting a nearly-optimal grouping strategy, which maintains its computational complexity independent of the size of the action space.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2023.

Builds on

21 of 39 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,264
  2. 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 785
  3. 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 292
  4. 2020Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted Regressioncited by 234
  5. 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 233
  6. 2019DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learningcited by 207
  7. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 200
  8. 2021Bilinear Classes: A Structural Framework for Provable Generalization in RLcited by 178
  9. 2019Provably efficient RL with Rich Observations via Latent State Decodingcited by 169
  10. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spacescited by 161
  11. 2021Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPscited by 129
  12. 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 127
9 more
  1. 2018Near-Optimal Representation Learning for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 110
  2. 2019Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning using Linearly Combined Model Ensemblescited by 100
  3. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 92
  4. 2020Exponential Lower Bounds for Planning in MDPs With Linearly-Realizable Optimal Action-Value Functionscited by 71
  5. 2017Near Optimal Behavior via Approximate State Abstractioncited by 66
  6. 2020Cost-Effective Federated Learning Designcited by 62
  7. 2022Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Block MDPs: A Model-free Representation Learning Approachcited by 51
  8. 2021Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Linearly-Parameterized MDPs with a Generative Modelcited by 18
  9. 2020Abstract Value Iteration for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.