mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting protein variants with equivariant graph neural networks

arXiv 2306.12231 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2023cs.LG q-bio.BMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained models have been successful in many protein engineering tasks. Most notably, sequence-based models have achieved state-of-the-art performance on protein fitness prediction while structure-based models have been used experimentally to develop proteins with enhanced functions. However, there is a research gap in comparing structure- and sequence-based methods for predicting protein variants that are better than the wildtype protein. This paper aims to address this gap by conducting a comparative study between the abilities of equivariant graph neural networks (EGNNs) and sequence-based approaches to identify promising amino-acid mutations. The results show that our proposed structural approach achieves a competitive performance to sequence-based methods while being trained on significantly fewer molecules. Additionally, we find that combining assay labelled data with structure pre-trained models yields similar trends as with sequence pre-trained models. Our code and trained models can be found at: https://github.com/semiluna/partIII-amino-acid-prediction.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

Builds on

3 of 19 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Protein Representation Learning by Geometric Structure Pretrainingcited by 161
  2. 2022Tranception: protein fitness prediction with autoregressive transformers and inference-time retrievalcited by 78
  3. 2021Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for 3D Macromolecular Structurecited by 53

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.