mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Semi-Autoregressive Graph Generative Model for Dependency Graph Parsing

arXiv 2306.12018 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent years have witnessed the impressive progress in Neural Dependency Parsing. According to the different factorization approaches to the graph joint probabilities, existing parsers can be roughly divided into autoregressive and non-autoregressive patterns. The former means that the graph should be factorized into multiple sequentially dependent components, then it can be built up component by component. And the latter assumes these components to be independent so that they can be outputted in a one-shot manner. However, when treating the directed edge as an explicit dependency relationship, we discover that there is a mixture of independent and interdependent components in the dependency graph, signifying that both aforementioned models fail to precisely capture the explicit dependencies among nodes and edges. Based on this property, we design a Semi-Autoregressive Dependency Parser to generate dependency graphs via adding node groups and edge groups autoregressively while pouring out all group elements in parallel. The model gains a trade-off between non-autoregression and autoregression, which respectively suffer from the lack of target inter-dependencies and the uncertainty of graph generation orders. The experiments show the proposed parser outperforms strong baselines on Enhanced Universal Dependencies of multiple languages, especially achieving 4% average promotion at graph-level accuracy. Also, the performances of model variations show the importance of specific parts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  5. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  6. 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
  7. 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 264
  8. 201975 Languages, 1 Model: Parsing Universal Dependencies Universallycited by 90
  9. 2019AMR Parsing as Sequence-to-Graph Transductioncited by 50
  10. 2020Efficient Second-Order TreeCRF for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 48
  11. 2020AMR Parsing via Graph-Sequence Iterative Inferencecited by 47
  12. 2018Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsingcited by 36
13 more
  1. 2021Order Matters: Probabilistic Modeling of Node Sequence for Graph Generationcited by 33
  2. 2019Broad-Coverage Semantic Parsing as Transductioncited by 32
  3. 2019Core Semantic First: A Top-down Approach for AMR Parsingcited by 24
  4. 2019Left-to-Right Dependency Parsing with Pointer Networkscited by 21
  5. 2019Second-Order Semantic Dependency Parsing with End-to-End Neural Networkscited by 21
  6. 2015Structured Training for Neural Network Transition-Based Parsingcited by 11
  7. 2019Global Greedy Dependency Parsingcited by 8
  8. 2020Global-aware Beam Search for Neural Abstractive Summarizationcited by 8
  9. 2020Enhanced Universal Dependency Parsing with Second-Order Inference and Mixture of Training Datacited by 5
  10. 2016Easy-First Dependency Parsing with Hierarchical Tree LSTMscited by 3
  11. 2021TGIF: Tree-Graph Integrated-Format Parser for Enhanced UD with Two-Stage Generic- to Individual-Language Finetuningcited by 3
  12. 2021Enhanced Universal Dependency Parsing with Automated Concatenation of Embeddingscited by 2
  13. 2016Bi-directional Attention with Agreement for Dependency Parsingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.