mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluation of Chinese-English Machine Translation of Emotion-Loaded Microblog Texts: A Human Annotated Dataset for the Quality Assessment of Emotion Translation

arXiv 2306.11900 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we focus on how current Machine Translation (MT) tools perform on the translation of emotion-loaded texts by evaluating outputs from Google Translate according to a framework proposed in this paper. We propose this evaluation framework based on the Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) and perform a detailed error analysis of the MT outputs. From our analysis, we observe that about 50% of the MT outputs fail to preserve the original emotion. After further analysis of the errors, we find that emotion carrying words and linguistic phenomena such as polysemous words, negation, abbreviation etc., are common causes for these translation errors.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2023.

Builds on

3 of 36 references.

References · 3

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2021Challenges in Translation of Emotions in Multilingual User-Generated Content: Twitter as a Case Studycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.