mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Model-free Closeness-of-influence Test for Features in Supervised Learning

arXiv 2306.11855 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2023cs.LG stat.MEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the effect of a feature vector x ∈ ℝd on the response value (label) y ∈ ℝ is the cornerstone of many statistical learning problems. Ideally, it is desired to understand how a set of collected features combine together and influence the response value, but this problem is notoriously difficult, due to the high-dimensionality of data and limited number of labeled data points, among many others. In this work, we take a new perspective on this problem, and we study the question of assessing the difference of influence that the two given features have on the response value. We first propose a notion of closeness for the influence of features, and show that our definition recovers the familiar notion of the magnitude of coefficients in the parametric model. We then propose a novel method to test for the closeness of influence in general model-free supervised learning problems. Our proposed test can be used with finite number of samples with control on type I error rate, no matter the ground truth conditional law L(Y |X). We analyze the power of our test for two general learning problems i) linear regression, and ii) binary classification under mixture of Gaussian models, and show that under the proper choice of score function, an internal component of our test, with sufficient number of samples will achieve full statistical power. We evaluate our findings through extensive numerical simulations, specifically we adopt the datamodel framework (Ilyas, et al., 2022) for CIFAR-10 dataset to identify pairs of training samples with different influence on the trained model via optional black box training mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2023.

Builds on

12 of 27 references.

References · 12

  1. 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
  2. 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 121
  3. 2013Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Regressioncited by 79
  4. 2014SLOPE - Adaptive variable selection via convex optimizationcited by 33
  5. 2020Fast and Powerful Conditional Randomization Testing via Distillationcited by 19
  6. 2019Online Debiasing for Adaptively Collected High-dimensional Data with Applications to Time Series Analysiscited by 13
  7. 2015Bayesian Approximate Kernel Regression with Variable Selectioncited by 6
  8. 2019Estimation and Inference for High Dimensional Generalized Linear Models: A Splitting and Smoothing Approachcited by 6
  9. 2018Rare Feature Selection in High Dimensionscited by 5
  10. 2021Pearson Chi-squared Conditional Randomization Testcited by 4
  11. 2022Learning to Increase the Power of Conditional Randomization Testscited by 2
  12. 2021Controlling the False Split Rate in Tree-Based Aggregationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.