Statistical Tests for Replacing Human Decision Makers with Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper proposes a statistical framework of using artificial intelligence to improve human decision making. The performance of each human decision maker is benchmarked against that of machine predictions. We replace the diagnoses made by a subset of the decision makers with the recommendation from the machine learning algorithm. We apply both a heuristic frequentist approach and a Bayesian posterior loss function approach to abnormal birth detection using a nationwide dataset of doctor diagnoses from prepregnancy checkups of reproductive age couples and pregnancy outcomes. We find that our algorithm on a test dataset results in a higher overall true positive rate and a lower false positive rate than the diagnoses made by doctors only.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2023.
Builds on
6 of 42 references.
References · 6
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
- 2018Direct Uncertainty Prediction for Medical Second Opinionscited by 61
- 2017Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2015Interpretable Classification Models for Recidivism Predictioncited by 44
- 2018A comparative study of artificial intelligence and human doctors for the purpose of triage and diagnosiscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.