Detection of Sensor-To-Sensor Variations using Explainable AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing concern for air quality and its impact on human health, interest in environmental gas monitoring has increased. However, chemi-resistive gas sensing devices are plagued by issues of sensor reproducibility during manufacturing. This study proposes a novel approach for detecting sensor-to-sensor variations in sensing devices using the explainable AI (XAI) method of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). This is achieved by identifying sensors that contribute the most to environmental gas concentration estimation via machine learning, and measuring the similarity of feature rankings between sensors to flag deviations or outliers. The methodology is tested using artificial and realistic Ozone concentration profiles to train a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) model. Two applications were explored in the study: the detection of wrong behaviors of sensors in the train dataset, and the detection of deviations in the test dataset. By training the GRU with the pruned train dataset, we could reduce computational costs while improving the model performance. Overall, the results show that our approach improves the understanding of sensor behavior, successfully detects sensor deviations down to 5-10% from the normal behavior, and leads to more efficient model preparation and calibration. Our method provides a novel solution for identifying deviating sensors, linking inconsistencies in hardware to sensor-to-sensor variations in the manufacturing process on an AI model-level.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2023.
Builds on
10 of 27 references.
References · 10
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2019Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruningcited by 89
- 2021Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approaches: A Surveycited by 40
- 2019GEE: A Gradient-based Explainable Variational Autoencoder for Network Anomaly Detectioncited by 36
- 2019Explaining Anomalies Detected by Autoencoders Using SHAPcited by 27
- 2020Utilizing Explainable AI for Quantization and Pruning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2022A general-purpose method for applying Explainable AI for Anomaly Detectioncited by 7
- 2020Evaluating Tree Explanation Methods for Anomaly Reasoning: A Case Study of SHAP TreeExplainer and TreeInterpretercited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.