mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FP-IRL: Fokker--Planck Inverse Reinforcement Learning -- A Physics-Constrained Approach to Markov Decision Processes

arXiv 2306.10407 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AI physics.bio-phcited by 0

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Inverse reinforcement learning

Abstract (arXiv)

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is a powerful paradigm for uncovering the incentive structure that drives agent behavior, by inferring an unknown reward function from observed trajectories within a Markov decision process (MDP). However, most existing IRL methods require access to the transition function, either prescribed or estimated textita priori, which poses significant challenges when the underlying dynamics are unknown, unobservable, or not easily sampled. We propose Fokker--Planck inverse reinforcement learning (FP-IRL), a novel physics-constrained IRL framework tailored for systems that can be described by Fokker--Planck (FP) dynamics. FP-IRL simultaneously infers both the reward and transition functions directly from trajectory data, without requiring access to sampled transitions. Our method leverages a correspondence between MDPs and the FP equation, linking reward maximization in MDPs with free energy minimization in FP dynamics. This connection enables inference of the FP potential function using our inference approach of variational system identification, from which the full set of MDP components -- reward, transition, and policy -- can be recovered using analytic expressions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of FP-IRL through experiments on synthetic benchmarks and a modified version of the Mountain Car problem. Our results show that FP-IRL achieves accurate recovery of agent incentives while preserving computational efficiency and physical interpretability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Inverse reinforcement learning, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 9 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2023.

Builds on

9 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning15 Feb
  2. 2022Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learning6 Dec
  3. 2019Multi-Agent Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning30 Jul
  4. 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progress18 Jun

Other references · 5

  1. 2016Guided Cost Learning: Deep Inverse Optimal Control via Policy Optimizationcited by 400
  2. 2021IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitationcited by 191
  3. 2017OptionGAN: Learning Joint Reward-Policy Options using Generative Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  4. 2016Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Simultaneous Estimation of Rewards and Dynamicscited by 24
  5. 2020Variational system identification of the partial differential equations governing microstructure evolution in materials: Inference over sparse and spatially unrelated datacited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2019Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2020Efficient Exploration of Reward Functions in Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Bayesian Optimization
  3. 2024Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards
  4. 2024How does Inverse RL Scale to Large State Spaces? A Provably Efficient Approach
  5. 2023A Novel Variational Lower Bound for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Revealed Preferences and Passive Stochastic Optimization
  7. 2021Inverse Reinforcement Learning in a Continuous State Space with Formal Guarantees
  8. 2026Fast Rates for Inverse Reinforcement Learning