mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigating Reproducibility at Interspeech Conferences: A Longitudinal and Comparative Perspective

arXiv 2306.10033 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2023cs.DL cs.LG eess.AScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reproducibility is a key aspect for scientific advancement across disciplines, and reducing barriers for open science is a focus area for the theme of Interspeech 2023. Availability of source code is one of the indicators that facilitates reproducibility. However, less is known about the rates of reproducibility at Interspeech conferences in comparison to other conferences in the field. In order to fill this gap, we have surveyed 27,717 papers at seven conferences across speech and language processing disciplines. We find that despite having a close number of accepted papers to the other conferences, Interspeech has up to 40% less source code availability. In addition to reporting the difficulties we have encountered during our research, we also provide recommendations and possible directions to increase reproducibility for further studies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.

Builds on

5 of 20 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
  2. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  3. 2021A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processingcited by 34
  4. 2023Missing Information, Unresponsive Authors, Experimental Flaws: The Impossibility of Assessing the Reproducibility of Previous Human Evaluations in NLPcited by 21
  5. 2022Quantified Reproducibility Assessment of NLP Resultscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.