mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feeding control and water quality monitoring in aquaculture systems: Opportunities and challenges

arXiv 2306.09920 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2023eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Aquaculture systems can benefit from the recent development of advanced control strategies to reduce operating costs and fish loss and increase growth production efficiency, resulting in fish welfare and health. Monitoring the water quality and controlling feeding are fundamental elements of balancing fish productivity and shaping the fish growth process. Currently, most fish-feeding processes are conducted manually in different phases and rely on time-consuming and challenging artificial discrimination. The feeding control approach influences fish growth and breeding through the feed conversion rate; hence, controlling these feeding parameters is crucial for enhancing fish welfare and minimizing general fishery costs. The high concentration of environmental factors, such as a high ammonia concentration and pH, affect the water quality and fish survival. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop control strategies to determine optimal, efficient, and reliable feeding processes and monitor water quality. This paper reviews the main control design techniques for fish growth in aquaculture systems, namely algorithms that optimize the feeding and water quality of a dynamic fish growth process. Specifically, we review model-based control approaches and model-free reinforcement learning strategies to optimize the growth and survival of the fish or track a desired reference live-weight growth trajectory. The model-free framework uses an approximate fish growth dynamic model and does not satisfy constraints. We discuss how model-based approaches can support a reinforcement learning framework to efficiently handle constraint satisfaction and find better trajectories and policies from value-based reinforcement learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 121 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.

Builds on

8 of 121 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limitcited by 140
  2. 2018Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learningcited by 73
  3. 2015Learning Deep Control Policies for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles with MPC-Guided Policy Searchcited by 42
  4. 2019Deep Value Model Predictive Controlcited by 20
  5. 2019Learning How to Autonomously Race a Car: a Predictive Control Approachcited by 14
  6. 2017Depth Control of Model-Free AUVs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  7. 2021Model Predictive Control Paradigms for Fish Growth Reference Tracking in Precision Aquaculturecited by 2
  8. 2019Suspension Regulation of Medium-low-speed Maglev Trains via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.