mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fit Like You Sample: Sample-Efficient Generalized Score Matching from Fast Mixing Diffusions

arXiv 2306.09332 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.DScited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Score matching is an approach to learning probability distributions parametrized up to a constant of proportionality (e.g. Energy-Based Models). The idea is to fit the score of the distribution, rather than the likelihood, thus avoiding the need to evaluate the constant of proportionality. While there's a clear algorithmic benefit, the statistical "cost'' can be steep: recent work by Koehler et al. 2022 showed that for distributions that have poor isoperimetric properties (a large Poincar'e or log-Sobolev constant), score matching is substantially statistically less efficient than maximum likelihood. However, many natural realistic distributions, e.g. multimodal distributions as simple as a mixture of two Gaussians in one dimension -- have a poor Poincar'e constant. In this paper, we show a close connection between the mixing time of a broad class of Markov processes with generator L and an appropriately chosen generalized score matching loss that tries to fit fracO pp. This allows us to adapt techniques to speed up Markov chains to construct better score-matching losses. In particular, ``preconditioning'' the diffusion can be translated to an appropriate ``preconditioning'' of the score loss. Lifting the chain by adding a temperature like in simulated tempering can be shown to result in a Gaussian-convolution annealed score matching loss, similar to Song and Ermon, 2019. Moreover, we show that if the distribution being learned is a finite mixture of Gaussians in d dimensions with a shared covariance, the sample complexity of annealed score matching is polynomial in the ambient dimension, the diameter of the means, and the smallest and largest eigenvalues of the covariance -- obviating the Poincar'e constant-based lower bounds of the basic score matching loss shown in Koehler et al. 2022.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.

Builds on

21 of 56 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  2. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
  3. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  4. 2021Score-Based Generative Modeling with Critically-Damped Langevin Diffusioncited by 230
  5. 2022Improved Analysis of Score-based Generative Modeling: User-Friendly Bounds under Minimal Smoothness Assumptionscited by 215
  6. 2022Convergence of score-based generative modeling for general data distributionscited by 179
  7. 2022Convergence for score-based generative modeling with polynomial complexitycited by 176
  8. 2015A Complete Recipe for Stochastic Gradient MCMCcited by 146
  9. 2014Statistical guarantees for the EM algorithm: From population to sample-based analysiscited by 131
  10. 2015Preconditioned Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics for Deep Neural Networkscited by 121
  11. 2017Mixture Models, Robustness, and Sum of Squares Proofscited by 81
  12. 2021Estimating High Order Gradients of the Data Distribution by Denoisingcited by 63
9 more
  1. 2022Statistical Efficiency of Score Matching: The View from Isoperimetrycited by 63
  2. 2019Minimum Stein Discrepancy Estimatorscited by 57
  3. 2016Ten Steps of EM Suffice for Mixtures of Two Gaussianscited by 40
  4. 2017Beyond Log-concavity: Provable Guarantees for Sampling Multi-modal Distributions using Simulated Tempering Langevin Monte Carlocited by 33
  5. 2019Optimal Convergence Rate of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Strongly Logconcave Distributionscited by 28
  6. 2023Provable benefits of score matchingcited by 18
  7. 2018Simulated Tempering Langevin Monte Carlo II: An Improved Proof using Soft Markov Chain Decompositioncited by 16
  8. 2016Stochastic Quasi-Newton Langevin Monte Carlocited by 14
  9. 2014Score Function Features for Discriminative Learning: Matrix and Tensor Frameworkcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

6 papers.