Fit Like You Sample: Sample-Efficient Generalized Score Matching from Fast Mixing Diffusions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Score matching is an approach to learning probability distributions parametrized up to a constant of proportionality (e.g. Energy-Based Models). The idea is to fit the score of the distribution, rather than the likelihood, thus avoiding the need to evaluate the constant of proportionality. While there's a clear algorithmic benefit, the statistical "cost'' can be steep: recent work by Koehler et al. 2022 showed that for distributions that have poor isoperimetric properties (a large Poincar'e or log-Sobolev constant), score matching is substantially statistically less efficient than maximum likelihood. However, many natural realistic distributions, e.g. multimodal distributions as simple as a mixture of two Gaussians in one dimension -- have a poor Poincar'e constant. In this paper, we show a close connection between the mixing time of a broad class of Markov processes with generator L and an appropriately chosen generalized score matching loss that tries to fit fracO pp. This allows us to adapt techniques to speed up Markov chains to construct better score-matching losses. In particular, ``preconditioning'' the diffusion can be translated to an appropriate ``preconditioning'' of the score loss. Lifting the chain by adding a temperature like in simulated tempering can be shown to result in a Gaussian-convolution annealed score matching loss, similar to Song and Ermon, 2019. Moreover, we show that if the distribution being learned is a finite mixture of Gaussians in d dimensions with a shared covariance, the sample complexity of annealed score matching is polynomial in the ambient dimension, the diameter of the means, and the smallest and largest eigenvalues of the covariance -- obviating the Poincar'e constant-based lower bounds of the basic score matching loss shown in Koehler et al. 2022.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.
Builds on
21 of 56 references.
References · 21
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2021Score-Based Generative Modeling with Critically-Damped Langevin Diffusioncited by 230
- 2022Improved Analysis of Score-based Generative Modeling: User-Friendly Bounds under Minimal Smoothness Assumptionscited by 215
- 2022Convergence of score-based generative modeling for general data distributionscited by 179
- 2022Convergence for score-based generative modeling with polynomial complexitycited by 176
- 2015A Complete Recipe for Stochastic Gradient MCMCcited by 146
- 2014Statistical guarantees for the EM algorithm: From population to sample-based analysiscited by 131
- 2015Preconditioned Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics for Deep Neural Networkscited by 121
- 2017Mixture Models, Robustness, and Sum of Squares Proofscited by 81
- 2021Estimating High Order Gradients of the Data Distribution by Denoisingcited by 63
9 more
- 2022Statistical Efficiency of Score Matching: The View from Isoperimetrycited by 63
- 2019Minimum Stein Discrepancy Estimatorscited by 57
- 2016Ten Steps of EM Suffice for Mixtures of Two Gaussianscited by 40
- 2017Beyond Log-concavity: Provable Guarantees for Sampling Multi-modal Distributions using Simulated Tempering Langevin Monte Carlocited by 33
- 2019Optimal Convergence Rate of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Strongly Logconcave Distributionscited by 28
- 2023Provable benefits of score matchingcited by 18
- 2018Simulated Tempering Langevin Monte Carlo II: An Improved Proof using Soft Markov Chain Decompositioncited by 16
- 2016Stochastic Quasi-Newton Langevin Monte Carlocited by 14
- 2014Score Function Features for Discriminative Learning: Matrix and Tensor Frameworkcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Learning Mixtures of Gaussians Using Diffusion Modelscited by 41
- 2024Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelinescited by 6
- 2024A Practical Diffusion Path for Samplingcited by 5
- 2024Discrete distributions are learnable from metastable samplescited by 2
- 2026Learning Energy-Based Models from Stochastic Interpolants using Spatiotemporal Differencescited by 2
- 2026Diffusion models recover accurate mixture weights despite score function insensitivitycited by 2
- 2026Diffusion models recover accurate mixture weights despite score function insensitivity16 Jul 2026
- 2026Learning Energy-Based Models from Stochastic Interpolants using Spatiotemporal Differences26 May 2026
- 2024Discrete distributions are learnable from metastable samples17 Oct 2024
- 2024Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines22 Jul 2024
- 2024A Practical Diffusion Path for Sampling20 Jun 2024
- 2024Learning Mixtures of Gaussians Using Diffusion Models29 Apr 2024