Measuring and Controlling Divisiveness in Rank Aggregation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In rank aggregation, members of a population rank issues to decide which are collectively preferred. We focus instead on identifying divisive issues that express disagreements among the preferences of individuals. We analyse the properties of our divisiveness measures and their relation to existing notions of polarisation. We also study their robustness under incomplete preferences and algorithms for control and manipulation of divisiveness. Our results advance our understanding of how to quantify disagreements in collective decision-making.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.
Builds on
6 of 34 references.
References · 6
- 2017Minimizing Polarization and Disagreement in Social Networkscited by 16
- 2021Designing Recommender Systems to Depolarizecited by 11
- 2020Adversarial Perturbations of Opinion Dynamics in Networkscited by 4
- 2020Safe Voting: Resilience to Abstention and Sybilscited by 2
- 2019Quantifying consensus of rankings based on q-support patternscited by 1
- 2022Manipulating Elections by Changing Voter Perceptionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Selecting the Most Conflicting Pair of Candidatescited by 1
- 2024Selecting the Most Conflicting Pair of Candidates9 May 2024