Contrastive Loss is All You Need to Recover Analogies as Parallel Lines
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While static word embedding models are known to represent linguistic analogies as parallel lines in high-dimensional space, the underlying mechanism as to why they result in such geometric structures remains obscure. We find that an elementary contrastive-style method employed over distributional information performs competitively with popular word embedding models on analogy recovery tasks, while achieving dramatic speedups in training time. Further, we demonstrate that a contrastive loss is sufficient to create these parallel structures in word embeddings, and establish a precise relationship between the co-occurrence statistics and the geometric structure of the resulting word embeddings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.
Builds on
7 of 20 references.
References · 7
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 63
- 2018Towards Understanding Linear Word Analogiescited by 57
- 2016Issues in evaluating semantic spaces using word analogiescited by 26
- 2020Analogies minus analogy test: measuring regularities in word embeddingscited by 17
- 2021Paraphrases do not explain word analogiescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.