mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Contrastive Loss is All You Need to Recover Analogies as Parallel Lines

arXiv 2306.08221 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While static word embedding models are known to represent linguistic analogies as parallel lines in high-dimensional space, the underlying mechanism as to why they result in such geometric structures remains obscure. We find that an elementary contrastive-style method employed over distributional information performs competitively with popular word embedding models on analogy recovery tasks, while achieving dramatic speedups in training time. Further, we demonstrate that a contrastive loss is sufficient to create these parallel structures in word embeddings, and establish a precise relationship between the co-occurrence statistics and the geometric structure of the resulting word embeddings.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.

Builds on

7 of 20 references.

References · 7

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
  3. 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 63
  4. 2018Towards Understanding Linear Word Analogiescited by 57
  5. 2016Issues in evaluating semantic spaces using word analogiescited by 26
  6. 2020Analogies minus analogy test: measuring regularities in word embeddingscited by 17
  7. 2021Paraphrases do not explain word analogiescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.