Large Language Models Sometimes Generate Purely Negatively-Reinforced Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When using adversarial training, it is common practice to train against the most egregious failures. However, this might imply using examples with sensitive information (such as leaked passwords or security vulnerabilities) as training data. One might assume that language models trained with gradient descent never generate text snippets which were only present in examples associated with the lowest possible reward. In this paper, we show that this assumption is wrong: in some situations, large language models do learn from such negatively-reinforced examples. We present a specific training setup that enables Pythia-160M to guess passwords 13% more often than it would by guessing randomly, despite only showing it these passwords on examples where the model is incentivized to not output these passwords. Our code is available at www.github.com/FabienRoger/Learning-From-Negative-Examples
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.
Builds on
9 of 12 references.
References · 9
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
- 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Studycited by 478
- 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 245
- 2022Adversarial Training for High-Stakes Reliabilitycited by 60
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.