Explaining CLIP through Co-Creative Drawings and Interaction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper analyses a visual archive of drawings produced by an interactive robotic art installation where audience members narrated their dreams into a system powered by CLIPdraw deep learning (DL) model that interpreted and transformed their dreams into images. The resulting archive of prompt-image pairs were examined and clustered based on concept representation accuracy. As a result of the analysis, the paper proposes four groupings for describing and explaining CLIP-generated results: clear concept, text-to-text as image, indeterminacy and confusion, and lost in translation. This article offers a glimpse into a collection of dreams interpreted, mediated and given form by Artificial Intelligence (AI), showcasing oftentimes unexpected, visually compelling or, indeed, the dream-like output of the system, with the emphasis on processes and results of translations between languages, sign-systems and various modules of the installation. In the end, the paper argues that proposed clusters support better understanding of the neural model.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.
Builds on
4 of 12 references.
References · 4
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021CLIPDraw: Exploring Text-to-Drawing Synthesis through Language-Image Encoderscited by 187
- 2022Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Designcited by 47
- 2022Synthetic Bookscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.