A Distribution Optimization Framework for Confidence Bounds of Risk Measures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a distribution optimization framework that significantly improves confidence bounds for various risk measures compared to previous methods. Our framework encompasses popular risk measures such as the entropic risk measure, conditional value at risk (CVaR), spectral risk measure, distortion risk measure, equivalent certainty, and rank-dependent expected utility, which are well established in risk-sensitive decision-making literature. To achieve this, we introduce two estimation schemes based on concentration bounds derived from the empirical distribution, specifically using either the Wasserstein distance or the supremum distance. Unlike traditional approaches that add or subtract a confidence radius from the empirical risk measures, our proposed schemes evaluate a specific transformation of the empirical distribution based on the distance. Consequently, our confidence bounds consistently yield tighter results compared to previous methods. We further verify the efficacy of the proposed framework by providing tighter problem-dependent regret bound for the CVaR bandit.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.
Builds on
8 of 37 references.
References · 8
- 2019Being Optimistic to Be Conservative: Quickly Learning a CVaR Policycited by 63
- 2021Universal Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 43
- 2021Off-Policy Risk Assessment in Contextual Banditscited by 29
- 2020Optimal Thompson Sampling strategies for support-aware CVaR banditscited by 26
- 2019A Wasserstein distance approach for concentration of empirical risk estimatescited by 18
- 2018Concentration bounds for empirical conditional value-at-risk: The unbounded casecited by 13
- 2019Estimation of Spectral Risk Measurescited by 9
- 2023Regret Bounds for Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Lipschitz Dynamic Risk Measurescited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.