mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fast light-field 3D microscopy with out-of-distribution detection and adaptation through Conditional Normalizing Flows

arXiv 2306.06408 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2023eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-time 3D fluorescence microscopy is crucial for the spatiotemporal analysis of live organisms, such as neural activity monitoring. The eXtended field-of-view light field microscope (XLFM), also known as Fourier light field microscope, is a straightforward, single snapshot solution to achieve this. The XLFM acquires spatial-angular information in a single camera exposure. In a subsequent step, a 3D volume can be algorithmically reconstructed, making it exceptionally well-suited for real-time 3D acquisition and potential analysis. Unfortunately, traditional reconstruction methods (like deconvolution) require lengthy processing times (0.0220 Hz), hampering the speed advantages of the XLFM. Neural network architectures can overcome the speed constraints at the expense of lacking certainty metrics, which renders them untrustworthy for the biomedical realm. This work proposes a novel architecture to perform fast 3D reconstructions of live immobilized zebrafish neural activity based on a conditional normalizing flow. It reconstructs volumes at 8 Hz spanning 512x512x96 voxels, and it can be trained in under two hours due to the small dataset requirements (10 image-volume pairs). Furthermore, normalizing flows allow for exact Likelihood computation, enabling distribution monitoring, followed by out-of-distribution detection and retraining of the system when a novel sample is detected. We evaluate the proposed method on a cross-validation approach involving multiple in-distribution samples (genetically identical zebrafish) and various out-of-distribution ones.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2023.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  4. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  5. 2019Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalizationcited by 1,295
  6. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  7. 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 423
  8. 2018Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 239
  9. 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
  10. 2019Guided Image Generation with Conditional Invertible Neural Networkscited by 147
  11. 2016Mean Absolute Percentage Error for regression modelscited by 58
  12. 2020Solving inverse problems using conditional invertible neural networkscited by 37
5 more
  1. 2020Wavelet Flow: Fast Training of High Resolution Normalizing Flowscited by 33
  2. 2019HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
  3. 2022Modeling sRGB Camera Noise with Normalizing Flowscited by 28
  4. 2021Conditional Invertible Neural Networks for Medical Imagingcited by 19
  5. 2020Learning to Reconstruct Confocal Microscopy Stacks from Single Light Field Imagescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.