Mechanism Design for Collaborative Normal Mean Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study collaborative normal mean estimation, where m strategic agents collect i.i.d samples from a normal distribution N(μ, σ2) at a cost. They all wish to estimate the mean μ. By sharing data with each other, agents can obtain better estimates while keeping the cost of data collection small. To facilitate this collaboration, we wish to design mechanisms that encourage agents to collect a sufficient amount of data and share it truthfully, so that they are all better off than working alone. In naive mechanisms, such as simply pooling and sharing all the data, an individual agent might find it beneficial to under-collect and/or fabricate data, which can lead to poor social outcomes. We design a novel mechanism that overcomes these challenges via two key techniques: first, when sharing the others' data with an agent, the mechanism corrupts this dataset proportional to how much the data reported by the agent differs from the others; second, we design minimax optimal estimators for the corrupted dataset. Our mechanism, which is Nash incentive compatible and individually rational, achieves a social penalty (sum of all agents' estimation errors and data collection costs) that is at most a factor 2 of the global minimum. When applied to high dimensional (non-Gaussian) distributions with bounded variance, this mechanism retains these three properties, but with slightly weaker results. Finally, in two special cases where we restrict the strategy space of the agents, we design mechanisms that essentially achieve the global minimum.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Online Learning from Strategic Human Feedback in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 10
- 2024Collaborative Mean Estimation Among Heterogeneous Strategic Agents: Individual Rationality, Fairness, and Truthful Contributioncited by 4
- 2026Revisiting Active Sequential Prediction-Powered Mean Estimationcited by 4
- 2025Designing DSIC Mechanisms for Data Sharing in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025A Cram'er-von Mises Approach to Incentivizing Truthful Data Sharingcited by 0
- 2026Gradient Manipulation in Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent with Strategic Agents: Truthful Incentives with Convergence Guaranteescited by 0
- 2026Truthful Online Preference Aggregation for LLM Fine-Tuning in Mobile Crowdsourcingcited by 0
- 2026Truthful Online Preference Aggregation for LLM Fine-Tuning in Mobile Crowdsourcing22 May 2026
- 2026Revisiting Active Sequential Prediction-Powered Mean Estimation20 Apr 2026
- 2026Gradient Manipulation in Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent with Strategic Agents: Truthful Incentives with Convergence Guarantees30 Mar 2026
- 2025A Cram'er-von Mises Approach to Incentivizing Truthful Data Sharing8 Jun 2025
- 2025Designing DSIC Mechanisms for Data Sharing in the Era of Large Language Models1 Jun 2025
- 2024Online Learning from Strategic Human Feedback in LLM Fine-Tuning22 Dec 2024
- 2024Collaborative Mean Estimation Among Heterogeneous Strategic Agents: Individual Rationality, Fairness, and Truthful Contribution20 Jul 2024