Adversarial Attack On Yolov5 For Traffic And Road Sign Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper implements and investigates popular adversarial attacks on the YOLOv5 Object Detection algorithm. The paper explores the vulnerability of the YOLOv5 to adversarial attacks in the context of traffic and road sign detection. The paper investigates the impact of different types of attacks, including the Limited memory Broyden Fletcher Goldfarb Shanno (L-BFGS), the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) attack, the Carlini and Wagner (C&W) attack, the Basic Iterative Method (BIM) attack, the Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attack, One Pixel Attack, and the Universal Adversarial Perturbations attack on the accuracy of YOLOv5 in detecting traffic and road signs. The results show that YOLOv5 is susceptible to these attacks, with misclassification rates increasing as the magnitude of the perturbations increases. We also explain the results using saliency maps. The findings of this paper have important implications for the safety and reliability of object detection algorithms used in traffic and transportation systems, highlighting the need for more robust and secure models to ensure their effectiveness in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.
Builds on
6 of 17 references.
References · 6
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 531
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
- 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
- 2023DeepSeaNet: Improving Underwater Object Detection using EfficientDetcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.