mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Higher Chest X-ray Resolution Improves Classification Performance

arXiv 2306.06051 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2023cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models for image classification are often trained at a resolution of 224 x 224 pixels for historical and efficiency reasons. However, chest X-rays are acquired at a much higher resolution to display subtle pathologies. This study investigates the effect of training resolution on chest X-ray classification performance, using the chest X-ray 14 dataset. The results show that training with a higher image resolution, specifically 1024 x 1024 pixels, results in the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 84.2 % compared to 82.7 % when trained with 256 x 256 pixel images. Additionally, comparison of bounding boxes and GradCAM saliency maps suggest that low resolutions, such as 256 x 256 pixels, are insufficient for identifying small pathologies and force the model to use spurious discriminating features. Our code is publicly available at https://gitlab.lrz.de/IP/cxr-resolution

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  5. 2022Delving into Masked Autoencoders for Multi-Label Thorax Disease Classificationcited by 65
  6. 2023Attention-based Saliency Maps Improve Interpretability of Pneumothorax Classificationcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.