Query Rewriting with Disjunctive Existential Rules and Mappings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the issue of answering unions of conjunctive queries (UCQs) with disjunctive existential rules and mappings. While this issue has already been well studied from a chase perspective, query rewriting within UCQs has hardly been addressed yet. We first propose a sound and complete query rewriting operator, which has the advantage of establishing a tight relationship between a chase step and a rewriting step. The associated breadth-first query rewriting algorithm outputs a minimal UCQ-rewriting when one exists. Second, we show that for any ``truly disjunctive'' nonrecursive rule, there exists a conjunctive query that has no UCQ-rewriting. It follows that the notion of finite unification sets (fus), which denotes sets of existential rules such that any UCQ admits a UCQ-rewriting, seems to have little relevance in this setting. Finally, turning our attention to mappings, we show that the problem of determining whether a UCQ admits a UCQ-rewriting through a disjunctive mapping is undecidable. We conclude with a number of open problems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.
Builds on
4 of 47 references.
References · 4
- 2013Ontology-based Data Access: A Study through Disjunctive Datalog, CSP, and MMSNPcited by 15
- 2013Sound, Complete and Minimal UCQ-Rewriting for Existential Rulescited by 8
- 2020First-Order Rewritability of Frontier-Guarded Ontology-Mediated Queriescited by 1
- 2021Parallelisable Existential Rules: a Story of Piecescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Abstractions of Queries in Ontology-Based Data Accesscited by 0
- 2026Abstractions of Queries in Ontology-Based Data Access23 Jun 2026