Overcoming Adversarial Attacks for Human-in-the-Loop Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Including human analysis has the potential to positively affect the robustness of Deep Neural Networks and is relatively unexplored in the Adversarial Machine Learning literature. Neural network visual explanation maps have been shown to be prone to adversarial attacks. Further research is needed in order to select robust visualizations of explanations for the image analyst to evaluate a given model. These factors greatly impact Human-In-The-Loop (HITL) evaluation tools due to their reliance on adversarial images, including explanation maps and measurements of robustness. We believe models of human visual attention may improve interpretability and robustness of human-machine imagery analysis systems. Our challenge remains, how can HITL evaluation be robust in this adversarial landscape?
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.
Builds on
8 of 12 references.
References · 8
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
- 2020Towards Robust Explanations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2020Detection Defense Against Adversarial Attacks with Saliency Mapcited by 10
- 2019A New Ensemble Adversarial Attack Powered by Long-term Gradient Memoriescited by 9
- 2021Towards a Robust and Trustworthy Machine Learning System Development: An Engineering Perspectivecited by 9
- 2017Adversarial Learning: A Critical Review and Active Learning Studycited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.