mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prediction of Transportation Index for Urban Patterns in Small and Medium-sized Indian Cities using Hybrid RidgeGAN Model

arXiv 2306.05951 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2023cs.LG physics.geo-ph stat.APcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid urbanization trend in most developing countries including India is creating a plethora of civic concerns such as loss of green space, degradation of environmental health, clean water availability, air pollution, traffic congestion leading to delays in vehicular transportation, etc. Transportation and network modeling through transportation indices have been widely used to understand transportation problems in the recent past. This necessitates predicting transportation indices to facilitate sustainable urban planning and traffic management. Recent advancements in deep learning research, in particular, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and their modifications in spatial data analysis such as CityGAN, Conditional GAN, and MetroGAN have enabled urban planners to simulate hyper-realistic urban patterns. These synthetic urban universes mimic global urban patterns and evaluating their landscape structures through spatial pattern analysis can aid in comprehending landscape dynamics, thereby enhancing sustainable urban planning. This research addresses several challenges in predicting the urban transportation index for small and medium-sized Indian cities. A hybrid framework based on Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) and CityGAN is introduced to predict transportation index using spatial indicators of human settlement patterns. This paper establishes a relationship between the transportation index and human settlement indicators and models it using KRR for the selected 503 Indian cities. The proposed hybrid pipeline, we call it RidgeGAN model, can evaluate the sustainability of urban sprawl associated with infrastructure development and transportation systems in sprawling cities. Experimental results show that the two-step pipeline approach outperforms existing benchmarks based on spatial and statistical measures.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.

Builds on

11 of 83 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2018Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measurescited by 224
  3. 2021The Principles of Deep Learning Theorycited by 169
  4. 2016Texture Synthesis with Spatial Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 45
  5. 2017How Generative Adversarial Networks and Their Variants Work: An Overviewcited by 17
  6. 2016MARTA GANs: Unsupervised Representation Learning for Remote Sensing Image Classificationcited by 16
  7. 2018Modeling urbanization patterns with generative adversarial networkscited by 7
  8. 2022MetroGAN: Simulating Urban Morphology with Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 5
  9. 2019Spatial sensitivity analysis for urban land use prediction with physics-constrained conditional generative adversarial networkscited by 4
  10. 2022GAN Inversion for Image Editing via Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 3
  11. 2020Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: A case study in Wuhan, Chinacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.