Enabling tabular deep learning when d gg n with an auxiliary knowledge graph
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models exhibit strong performance on datasets with abundant labeled samples. However, for tabular datasets with extremely high d-dimensional features but limited n samples (i.e. d gg n), machine learning models struggle to achieve strong performance due to the risk of overfitting. Here, our key insight is that there is often abundant, auxiliary domain information describing input features which can be structured as a heterogeneous knowledge graph (KG). We propose PLATO, a method that achieves strong performance on tabular data with d gg n by using an auxiliary KG describing input features to regularize a multilayer perceptron (MLP). In PLATO, each input feature corresponds to a node in the auxiliary KG. In the MLP's first layer, each input feature also corresponds to a weight vector. PLATO is based on the inductive bias that two input features corresponding to similar nodes in the auxiliary KG should have similar weight vectors in the MLP's first layer. PLATO captures this inductive bias by inferring the weight vector for each input feature from its corresponding node in the KG via a trainable message-passing function. Across 6 d gg n datasets, PLATO outperforms 13 state-of-the-art baselines by up to 10.19%.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.
Builds on
29 of 73 references.
References · 29
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,003
- 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 964
- 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 929
- 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 897
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
17 more
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
- 2018AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networkscited by 319
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
- 2013Predicting Parameters in Deep Learningcited by 223
- 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 200
- 2021Self-Attention Between Datapoints: Going Beyond Individual Input-Output Pairs in Deep Learningcited by 112
- 2019Concrete Autoencoders for Differentiable Feature Selection and Reconstructioncited by 90
- 2018Deep Neural Decision Treescited by 72
- 2020The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computationcited by 57
- 2015Network Lasso: Clustering and Optimization in Large Graphscited by 42
- 2018DeepPINK: reproducible feature selection in deep neural networkscited by 41
- 2016Diet Networks: Thin Parameters for Fat Genomicscited by 12
- 2018Feature Selection using Stochastic Gatescited by 12
- 2020Post-selection inference with HSIC-Lassocited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.