Online Tensor Learning: Computational and Statistical Trade-offs, Adaptivity and Optimal Regret
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large tensor learning algorithms are typically computationally expensive and require storing a vast amount of data. In this paper, we propose a unified online Riemannian gradient descent (oRGrad) algorithm for tensor learning, which is computationally efficient, consumes much less memory, and can handle sequentially arriving data while making timely predictions. The algorithm is applicable to both linear and generalized linear models. If the time horizon T is known, oRGrad achieves statistical optimality by choosing an appropriate fixed step size. We find that noisy tensor completion particularly benefits from online algorithms by avoiding the trimming procedure and ensuring sharp entry-wise statistical error, which is often technically challenging for offline methods. The regret of oRGrad is analyzed, revealing a fascinating trilemma concerning the computational convergence rate, statistical error, and regret bound. By selecting an appropriate constant step size, oRGrad achieves an O(T1/2) regret. We then introduce the adaptive-oRGrad algorithm, which can achieve the optimal O(log T) regret by adaptively selecting step sizes, regardless of whether the time horizon is known. The adaptive-oRGrad algorithm can attain a statistically optimal error rate without knowing the horizon. Comprehensive numerical simulations corroborate our theoretical findings. We show that oRGrad significantly outperforms its offline counterpart in predicting the solar F10.7 index with tensor predictors that monitor space weather impacts.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2023.
Builds on
14 of 83 references.
References · 14
- 2015Fast low-rank estimation by projected gradient descent: General statistical and algorithmic guaranteescited by 68
- 2019Community Detection for Hypergraph Networks via Regularized Tensor Power Iterationcited by 26
- 2016Guarantees of Riemannian Optimization for Low Rank Matrix Completioncited by 19
- 2022Tensor-on-Tensor Regression: Riemannian Optimization, Over-parameterization, Statistical-computational Gap, and Their Interplaycited by 15
- 2021Latent Space Model for Higher-order Networks and Generalized Tensor Decompositioncited by 13
- 2021Implicit Regularization and Entrywise Convergence of Riemannian Optimization for Low Tucker-Rank Tensor Completioncited by 9
- 2020Semi-parametric TEnsor Factor Analysis by Iteratively Projected Singular Value Decompositioncited by 8
- 2014Sparse Bilinear Logistic Regressioncited by 7
- 2022Optimal Clustering by Lloyd Algorithm for Low-Rank Mixture Modelcited by 5
- 2023On High-dimensional and Low-rank Tensor Banditscited by 5
- 2023Computationally Efficient and Statistically Optimal Robust High-Dimensional Linear Regressioncited by 4
- 2022Riemannian optimization using three different metrics for Hermitian PSD fixed-rank constraints: an extended versioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023High-dimensional Linear Bandits with Knapsackscited by 3
- 2025Fourier Low-rank and Sparse Tensor for Efficient Tensor Completioncited by 1
- 2026Tensor Completion using Subspace Informationcited by 0
- 2026Tensor Completion using Subspace Information21 Sep 2026
- 2025Fourier Low-rank and Sparse Tensor for Efficient Tensor Completion16 May 2025
- 2023High-dimensional Linear Bandits with Knapsacks2 Nov 2023