PokemonChat: Auditing ChatGPT for Pok'emon Universe Knowledge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recently released ChatGPT model demonstrates unprecedented capabilities in zero-shot question-answering. In this work, we probe ChatGPT for its conversational understanding and introduce a conversational framework (protocol) that can be adopted in future studies. The Pok'emon universe serves as an ideal testing ground for auditing ChatGPT's reasoning capabilities due to its closed world assumption. After bringing ChatGPT's background knowledge (on the Pok'emon universe) to light, we test its reasoning process when using these concepts in battle scenarios. We then evaluate its ability to acquire new knowledge and include it in its reasoning process. Our ultimate goal is to assess ChatGPT's ability to generalize, combine features, and to acquire and reason over newly introduced knowledge from human feedback. We find that ChatGPT has prior knowledge of the Pokemon universe, which can reason upon in battle scenarios to a great extent, even when new information is introduced. The model performs better with collaborative feedback and if there is an initial phase of information retrieval, but also hallucinates occasionally and is susceptible to adversarial attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.
Builds on
9 of 19 references.
References · 9
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 692
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 447
- 2022Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inferencecited by 145
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity
- 2023A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets
- 2023Chatbots as Problem Solvers: Playing Twenty Questions with Role Reversals
- 2023GPTEval: A Survey on Assessments of ChatGPT and GPT-4
- 2023Consistency Analysis of ChatGPT
- 2023Can Large Language Models Play Text Games Well? Current State-of-the-Art and Open Questions
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?