An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Self-supervised Discrete Representations of Speech
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised representation learning for speech often involves a quantization step that transforms the acoustic input into discrete units. However, it remains unclear how to characterize the relationship between these discrete units and abstract phonetic categories such as phonemes. In this paper, we develop an information-theoretic framework whereby we represent each phonetic category as a distribution over discrete units. We then apply our framework to two different self-supervised models (namely wav2vec 2.0 and XLSR) and use American English speech as a case study. Our study demonstrates that the entropy of phonetic distributions reflects the variability of the underlying speech sounds, with phonetically similar sounds exhibiting similar distributions. While our study confirms the lack of direct, one-to-one correspondence, we find an intriguing, indirect relationship between phonetic categories and discrete units.
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2023.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,301
- 2020Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning for Speech Recognitioncited by 496
- 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Reviewcited by 258
- 2023Analysing Discrete Self Supervised Speech Representation for Spoken Language Modelingcited by 47
- 2022Are discrete units necessary for Spoken Language Modeling?cited by 24
- 2020Phonotactic Complexity and its Trade-offscited by 23
- 2021A surprisal--duration trade-off across and within the world's languagescited by 22
- 2019Morphological Irregularity Correlates with Frequencycited by 13
- 2021Discrete representations in neural models of spoken languagecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 8; 2026: 2.
15 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semanticcited by 70
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?cited by 62
- 2025Recent Advances in Discrete Speech Tokens: A Reviewcited by 42
- 2024Sylber: Syllabic Embedding Representation of Speech from Raw Audiocited by 19
- 2023Self-Supervised Models of Speech Infer Universal Articulatory Kinematicscited by 16
- 2025Leveraging Allophony in Self-Supervised Speech Models for Atypical Pronunciation Assessmentcited by 15
- 2023SD-HuBERT: Sentence-Level Self-Distillation Induces Syllabic Organization in HuBERTcited by 13
- 2026[b] = [d] - [t] + [p]: Self-supervised Speech Models Discover Phonological Vector Arithmeticcited by 11
- 2026Self-Supervised Speech Models Encode Phonetic Context via Position-dependent Orthogonal Subspacescited by 7
- 2025Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech Representationscited by 5
- 2025What do self-supervised speech models know about Dutch? Analyzing advantages of language-specific pre-trainingcited by 4
- 2025Discrete Speech Unit Extraction via Independent Component Analysiscited by 3
3 more
- 2025Word stress in self-supervised speech models: A cross-linguistic comparisoncited by 3
- 2025Transcribe, Translate, or Transliterate: An Investigation of Intermediate Representations in Spoken Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Improved Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech using Conditional Flow Matchingcited by 1
- 2026Self-Supervised Speech Models Encode Phonetic Context via Position-dependent Orthogonal Subspaces13 Mar 2026
- 2026[b] = [d] - [t] + [p]: Self-supervised Speech Models Discover Phonological Vector Arithmetic21 Feb 2026
- 2025Transcribe, Translate, or Transliterate: An Investigation of Intermediate Representations in Spoken Language Models2 Oct 2025
- 2025Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech Representations19 Sep 2025
- 2025Word stress in self-supervised speech models: A cross-linguistic comparison7 Jul 2025
- 2025Improved Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech using Conditional Flow Matching19 Jun 2025
- 2025What do self-supervised speech models know about Dutch? Analyzing advantages of language-specific pre-training1 Jun 2025
- 2025Leveraging Allophony in Self-Supervised Speech Models for Atypical Pronunciation Assessment10 Feb 2025
- 2025Recent Advances in Discrete Speech Tokens: A Review10 Feb 2025
- 2025Discrete Speech Unit Extraction via Independent Component Analysis11 Jan 2025
- 2024Sylber: Syllabic Embedding Representation of Speech from Raw Audio9 Oct 2024
- 2024Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semantic12 Jun 2024
- 2024Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semanticcited by 70
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?cited by 62
- 2025Recent Advances in Discrete Speech Tokens: A Reviewcited by 42
- 2024Sylber: Syllabic Embedding Representation of Speech from Raw Audiocited by 19
- 2023Self-Supervised Models of Speech Infer Universal Articulatory Kinematicscited by 16
- 2025Leveraging Allophony in Self-Supervised Speech Models for Atypical Pronunciation Assessmentcited by 15
- 2023SD-HuBERT: Sentence-Level Self-Distillation Induces Syllabic Organization in HuBERTcited by 13
- 2026[b] = [d] - [t] + [p]: Self-supervised Speech Models Discover Phonological Vector Arithmeticcited by 11
- 2026Self-Supervised Speech Models Encode Phonetic Context via Position-dependent Orthogonal Subspacescited by 7
- 2025Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech Representationscited by 5
- 2025What do self-supervised speech models know about Dutch? Analyzing advantages of language-specific pre-trainingcited by 4
- 2025Discrete Speech Unit Extraction via Independent Component Analysiscited by 3
12 most cited of 14 All 14 (JSON)
- 2026Self-Supervised Speech Models Encode Phonetic Context via Position-dependent Orthogonal Subspaces13 Mar 2026
- 2026[b] = [d] - [t] + [p]: Self-supervised Speech Models Discover Phonological Vector Arithmetic21 Feb 2026
- 2025Transcribe, Translate, or Transliterate: An Investigation of Intermediate Representations in Spoken Language Models2 Oct 2025
- 2025Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech Representations19 Sep 2025
- 2025Word stress in self-supervised speech models: A cross-linguistic comparison7 Jul 2025
- 2025What do self-supervised speech models know about Dutch? Analyzing advantages of language-specific pre-training1 Jun 2025
- 2025Leveraging Allophony in Self-Supervised Speech Models for Atypical Pronunciation Assessment10 Feb 2025
- 2025Recent Advances in Discrete Speech Tokens: A Review10 Feb 2025
- 2025Discrete Speech Unit Extraction via Independent Component Analysis11 Jan 2025
- 2024Sylber: Syllabic Embedding Representation of Speech from Raw Audio9 Oct 2024
- 2024Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semantic12 Jun 2024
- 2023SD-HuBERT: Sentence-Level Self-Distillation Induces Syllabic Organization in HuBERT16 Oct 2023
12 newest of 14 All 14 (JSON)