mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Robustness of Image Recognition Models on Hardware Accelerators

arXiv 2306.01697 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.SE cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on resource-intensive and safety-critical tasks increases, a variety of Machine Learning (ML) compilers have been developed, enabling compatibility of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) with a variety of hardware acceleration devices. However, given that DNNs are widely utilized for challenging and demanding tasks, the behavior of these compilers must be verified. To this direction, we propose MutateNN, a tool that utilizes elements of both differential and mutation testing in order to examine the robustness of image recognition models when deployed on hardware accelerators with different capabilities, in the presence of faults in their target device code - introduced either by developers, or problems in their compilation process. We focus on the image recognition domain by applying mutation testing to 7 well-established DNN models, introducing 21 mutations of 6 different categories. We deployed our mutants on 4 different hardware acceleration devices of varying capabilities and observed that DNN models presented discrepancies of up to 90.3% in mutants related to conditional operators across devices. We also observed that mutations related to layer modification, arithmetic types and input affected severely the overall model performance (up to 99.8%) or led to model crashes, in a consistent manner across devices.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2023.

Builds on

18 of 35 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  8. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
  9. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,194
  10. 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 453
  11. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  12. 2021Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformercited by 274
6 more
  1. 2019Taxonomy of Real Faults in Deep Learning Systemscited by 90
  2. 2018DeepMutation: Mutation Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 66
  3. 2020MLIR: A Compiler Infrastructure for the End of Moore's Lawcited by 64
  4. 2022NNSmith: Generating Diverse and Valid Test Cases for Deep Learning Compilerscited by 29
  5. 2022Coverage-Guided Tensor Compiler Fuzzing with Joint IR-Pass Mutationcited by 9
  6. 2022Fuzzing Deep Learning Compilers with HirGencited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.