mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reduction of finite sampling noise in quantum neural networks

arXiv 2306.01639 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2023quant-ph cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum neural networks (QNNs) use parameterized quantum circuits with data-dependent inputs and generate outputs through the evaluation of expectation values. Calculating these expectation values necessitates repeated circuit evaluations, thus introducing fundamental finite-sampling noise even on error-free quantum computers. We reduce this noise by introducing the variance regularization, a technique for reducing the variance of the expectation value during the quantum model training. This technique requires no additional circuit evaluations if the QNN is properly constructed. Our empirical findings demonstrate the reduced variance speeds up the training and lowers the output noise as well as decreases the number of necessary evaluations of gradient circuits. This regularization method is benchmarked on the regression of multiple functions and the potential energy surface of water. We show that in our examples, it lowers the variance by an order of magnitude on average and leads to a significantly reduced noise level of the QNN. We finally demonstrate QNN training on a real quantum device and evaluate the impact of error mitigation. Here, the optimization is feasible only due to the reduced number of necessary shots in the gradient evaluation resulting from the reduced variance.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2023.

Builds on

25 of 63 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  3. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  4. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
  5. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 330
  6. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
  7. 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 214
  8. 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 202
  9. 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 192
  10. 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
  11. 2019Efficient Learning for Deep Quantum Neural Networkscited by 160
  12. 2020Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 124
13 more
  1. 2020Entanglement Induced Barren Plateauscited by 101
  2. 2021Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networkscited by 100
  3. 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 90
  4. 2020Layerwise learning for quantum neural networkscited by 87
  5. 2020Effect of barren plateaus on gradient-free optimizationcited by 79
  6. 2021Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computerscited by 69
  7. 2020Universal Approximation Property of Quantum Machine Learning Models in Quantum-Enhanced Feature Spacescited by 44
  8. 2020On barren plateaus and cost function locality in variational quantum algorithmscited by 36
  9. 2019Input Redundancy for Parameterized Quantum Circuitscited by 33
  10. 2019Low-depth gradient measurements can improve convergence in variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithmscited by 31
  11. 2021Can Error Mitigation Improve Trainability of Noisy Variational Quantum Algorithms?cited by 14
  12. 2023Quantum Gaussian Process Regression for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 9
  13. 2022Quantum neural networks force fields generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

12 papers.