mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ambiguity in solving imaging inverse problems with deep learning based operators

arXiv 2305.19774 ↗First posted 31 May 2023cs.CV cs.LG cs.NAcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, large convolutional neural networks have been widely used as tools for image deblurring, because of their ability in restoring images very precisely. It is well known that image deblurring is mathematically modeled as an ill-posed inverse problem and its solution is difficult to approximate when noise affects the data. Really, one limitation of neural networks for deblurring is their sensitivity to noise and other perturbations, which can lead to instability and produce poor reconstructions. In addition, networks do not necessarily take into account the numerical formulation of the underlying imaging problem, when trained end-to-end. In this paper, we propose some strategies to improve stability without losing to much accuracy to deblur images with deep-learning based methods. First, we suggest a very small neural architecture, which reduces the execution time for training, satisfying a green AI need, and does not extremely amplify noise in the computed image. Second, we introduce a unified framework where a pre-processing step balances the lack of stability of the following, neural network-based, step. Two different pre-processors are presented: the former implements a strong parameter-free denoiser, and the latter is a variational model-based regularized formulation of the latent imaging problem. This framework is also formally characterized by mathematical analysis. Numerical experiments are performed to verify the accuracy and stability of the proposed approaches for image deblurring when unknown or not-quantified noise is present; the results confirm that they improve the network stability with respect to noise. In particular, the model-based framework represents the most reliable trade-off between visual precision and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2023.

Builds on

9 of 28 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dynamic Scene Deblurringcited by 727
  3. 2022Simple Baselines for Image Restorationcited by 708
  4. 2020Deblurring by Realistic Blurringcited by 188
  5. 2015Learning a Convolutional Neural Network for Non-uniform Motion Blur Removalcited by 149
  6. 2022Deep Image Deblurring: A Surveycited by 94
  7. 2020The troublesome kernel -- On hallucinations, no free lunches and the accuracy-stability trade-off in inverse problemscited by 40
  8. 2021The mathematics of adversarial attacks in AI -- Why deep learning is unstable despite the existence of stable neural networkscited by 16
  9. 2022To be or not to be stable, that is the question: understanding neural networks for inverse problemscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

8 papers.